Placenta
Volume 30, Supplement , Pages 32-37, March 2009

The Two Stage Model of Preeclampsia: Variations on the Theme

  • J.M. Roberts

      Affiliations

    • Magee-Womens Research Institute, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
    • Department of Obstetrics Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
    • Department of Epidemiology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Magee-Womens Research Institute, University of Pittsburgh, 204 Craft Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15213-3180, USA. Tel.: +1 412 641 1427; fax: +1 412 641 1503.
  • ,
  • C.A. Hubel

      Affiliations

    • Magee-Womens Research Institute, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
    • Department of Obstetrics Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA

Accepted 14 November 2008. published online 15 December 2008.

Abstract 

The Two Stage Model of preeclampsia proposes that a poorly perfused placenta (Stage 1) produces factor(s) leading to the clinical manifestations of preeclampsia (Stage 2). Stage 1 is not sufficient to cause the maternal syndrome but interacts with maternal constitutional factors (genetic, behavioral or environmental) to result in Stage 2. Recent information indicates the necessity for modifications of this model. It is apparent that changes relevant to preeclampsia and other implantation disorders can be detected in the first trimester, long before the failed vascular remodeling necessary to reduce placental perfusion is completed. In addition, although the factor(s) released from the placenta has usually been considered a toxin, we suggest that what is released may also be an appropriate signal from the fetal/placental unit to overcome reduced nutrient availability that cannot be tolerated by some women who develop preeclampsia. Further, it is evident that linkage is not likely to be one factor but several, different for different women. Also although the initial model limited the role of maternal constitutional factors to the genesis of Stage 2, this does not appear to be the case. It is evident that the factors increasing risk for preeclampsia are also associated with abnormal implantation. These several modifications have important implications. An earlier origin for Stage 1, which appears to be recognizable by altered concentrations of placental products, could allow earlier intervention. The possibility of a fetal placental factor increasing nutrient availability could provide novel therapeutic options. Different linkages and preeclampsia subtypes could direct specific preventive treatments for different women while the role of maternal constitutional factors to affect placentation provides targets for prepregnancy therapy. The modified Two Stage Model provides a useful guide towards investigating pathophysiology and guiding therapy.

Keywords: Preeclampsia, Implantation, Placentation, Intrauterine growth restriction, Subtypes, Cardiovascular disease, Metabolic syndrome, Preterm birth

 

PII: S0143-4004(08)00384-6

doi:10.1016/j.placenta.2008.11.009

Placenta
Volume 30, Supplement , Pages 32-37, March 2009