Placenta
Volume 31, Issue 1 , Pages 37-43 , January 2010

Blood flow volume of uterine arteries in human pregnancies determined using 3D and bi-dimensional imaging, angio-Doppler, and fluid-dynamic modeling

  • S. Rigano

      Affiliations

    • Buzzi Children's Hospital - Clinical Sciences Department Sacco, University Department of Clinical Sciences, Dept Obstet Gynecol, University of Milan, Via Catelvetro 32, 20157 Milan, Italy
  • ,
  • E. Ferrazzi

      Affiliations

    • Buzzi Children's Hospital - Clinical Sciences Department Sacco, University Department of Clinical Sciences, Dept Obstet Gynecol, University of Milan, Via Catelvetro 32, 20157 Milan, Italy
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Tel.: +39 239042818; fax: +39 23565061.
  • ,
  • S. Boito

      Affiliations

    • Mangiagalli Institute, University of Milan, Italy
  • ,
  • G. Pennati

      Affiliations

    • LaBS, Politecnico di Milano Milan, Italy
  • ,
  • A. Padoan

      Affiliations

    • Buzzi Children's Hospital - Clinical Sciences Department Sacco, University Department of Clinical Sciences, Dept Obstet Gynecol, University of Milan, Via Catelvetro 32, 20157 Milan, Italy
  • ,
  • H. Galan

      Affiliations

    • University of Colorado Health Sciences Center, Denver, CO, USA

,Accepted 22 October 2009.

  • Image Result

    a) 3D-angio-Doppler imaging of UtA, approximately 15 mm upstream to vessel bifurcation on the common trunk of the uterine artery at the level of the cross-over external iliac vessels. After the 3D geo

    a) 3D-angio-Doppler imaging of UtA, approximately 15 mm upstream to vessel bifurcation on the common trunk of the uterine artery at the level of the cross-over external iliac vessels. After the 3D geometry of the vessel and the spot (∅) where to measure the uterine artery was visualized the sonologist moved the probe in order to put the uterine vessel on the 2D plane where the combination of tissue imaging and angio imaging provides the best view of the spot where to measure the diameter. b) UtA diameter measured along the common UtA trunk (∅ on Fig. 1a) UtA was evidenced by angio-Doppler box and calipers were placed at the inner edges of the vessel on B-mode imaging, after partial removal of the box. c) UtA blood flow velocity measurement. After the diameter is measured, the transabdominal probe is rotated approximately 90° on the ideal fulcrum of the spot were the diameter was measured (∅) to obtain a Doppler beam angle <30 and as closest as possible to 0°.

  • Image Result
    UtA absolute flow volume (ml/min) plotted on gestational age. Original findings are reported as full dots. Best fit regression (y = 2.5589x1.456). Upper and lower continuous lines represent the 5th, 1

    UtA absolute flow volume (ml/min) plotted on gestational age. Original findings are reported as full dots. Best fit regression (y = 2.5589x1.456). Upper and lower continuous lines represent the 5th, 10th, 90th, and 95th percentiles.

  • Image Result
    a) Uta flow expressed per kg fetal weight (ml/min/kg) plotted on gestational age. Best fit regression (y = 162188x−1.8979). Upper and lower continuous lines represent the 5th, 10th, 90th, and 95th per

    a) Uta flow expressed per kg fetal weight (ml/min/kg) plotted on gestational age. Best fit regression (y = 162188x−1.8979). Upper and lower continuous lines represent the 5th, 10th, 90th, and 95th percentiles. Five longitudinal observations are plotted as individual lines. b) UtA blood flow volume ml/min/kg. Values are reported as 10th, 50th, 90th percentile.

  • Image Result
    Correlation between UtA flow volume calculated in a single artery and the PI measured in the same vessel, (Pearson r = −0.53). Black dots, data point. Continuous line, best fitting regression (y = 95.

    Correlation between UtA flow volume calculated in a single artery and the PI measured in the same vessel, (Pearson r = −0.53). Black dots, data point. Continuous line, best fitting regression (y = 95.696x−1.1438). Dashed lines 25th and the 75th percentiles.

PII: S0143-4004(09)00333-6

doi: 10.1016/j.placenta.2009.10.010

Placenta
Volume 31, Issue 1 , Pages 37-43 , January 2010